Rules of the Blog

  • This blog is about conversation. I'm using this as a place to create, mold and experiment and you're welcome to join me in the process. These are my thoughts and my views of the world, so try not to think that I'm saying anything bigger than myself... Feedback = Good. New Thoughts or Topics = Great. Constructive Criticism & Debate = Awesome.

Subscribe now and stay up to date!

My Blogroll

« My first "idol" | Main | Continuing the influence thread: consumers marketing to themselves »

June 26, 2007

Settling vs. Compromising

I believe in compromise.

I don't believe in settling.

 

People often confuse these two statements. I hear people using them interchangeably, but they're not the same.

 

Compromise is about ideas in conflict coming together to create a workable and beneficial amalgamation, hopefully one that increases harmony, reaches a balance and combines efforts. imageWikipedia says, "In arguments, compromise is a concept of finding agreement through communication, through a mutual acceptance of terms—often involving variations from an original goal or desire." As with the concept of Yin-Yang, opposing forces can also be complementary and achieve a balance. A balance that is in movement, keeping one another in check. Compromise is healthy, sustainable and central to the process of growth and development.

 

Settling is about stopping. Settling is the process of coming to a stop. Bodies in motion coming to rest. When people misuse settling as a term that is interchangeable with compromise, what they're really saying is that it's time to give up. Time to come to a rest and stop debating, stop working towards a better solution, stop improving what exists today. Whether you're settling for a relationship partner, or settling for a job or settling for who you are, don't kid yourself: you're not compromising. Rather than giving some of your ideas to a shared conception of the way forward, you're pulling back from the conversation and refusing to struggle to be part of the better future that can exist.

There is no way forward when you settle. There is only here. Here is not good enough.

Are you settling or compromising? 

 

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/316954/19604676

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Settling vs. Compromising:

Comments

I think a potential additional benifit of "compromises" is that they are not necessarily zero sum games, but you can also grow the pie in a mutually benificial way to the respective stakeholders.

Absolutely. As I was discussing when I said that the opposing forces can be complementary, encouraging conversations over conflicts can often lead to a better solution. That sort of behavior usually enhances the end result as well as the relationships involved. Definitely "pie growing" behavior :)

here's my opinion.

compromise happens between two people with a common goal. settling happens with one person.

Hmm, Sylvia, interesting perspective. Feels a bit too simple for me, but I see where you're going with it and I like the "external vs. internal" implication. Thanks for the comment!

Post a comment

  • www.flickr.com
    This is a Flickr badge showing public photos from rganguly47. Make your own badge here.

  • AdSense Ads